Now even a child can disprove atheism with the Questions: "What happened right before the atom began to form?" or "Where did the protons and electrons come from?" If a child continues to ask such questions, the atheist will come to the point where it is imperative for there to be a personal cause for these sequenced events to take place.
Sir Isaac Newton, the brilliant scientist and noted theist, discovered the law of cause and effect. Because of this law, we can say that a personal cause outside fo the universe, a mechanical system, caused the universe to come into existence. And this personal cause is not subject to the laws of the universe because it is outside of the universe and it created the laws to start with. The law of gravity, the laws of nature, and the law of cause and effect are laws of this universe. The creator created these laws. Before he created them, they did not exist. Therefore he is not subject to them. He is not subject to nature, thus he is supernatural. He does not grow or diminish. He does not need food or drink, shelter or sleep. And he is not subject to cause and effect. So the question who caused or who created God is a nonsensical one. The creator created creation. The causer caused cause to exist. Scientists call him the First Cause. They deduce that there must be an infinite being which created the finite universe. And his existence is NECESSARY for our existence and the existence of the universe.
This is an irrefutable fact. Those who call themselves atheists write books and give lectures arguing against a religious or a personal god, not against god in general as a supernatural being which brought the universe into existence. This is because they can't. The atheist evangelist Richard Dawkins, in his book "The God Delusion" describes himself as 6/7ths of an atheist. What does that mean? I am not 3/4ths of a theist. The reason that he has levels of atheism is because he is not really an atheist. He has admitted in his own book that he is not fully convinced that God doesn't exist. Which means that he is not an atheist. He is a wishful deist. He wishes that God doesn't exist, thus his books title is disingenuous. It should be "Maybe God is a Delusion" or "God is a Delusion, Hopefully."But he like, Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking did, must admit that this universe has a creator because all evidence points towards a creator, including evolution.
Don't be fooled, evolution does not negate the existence of God in any way. In fact, for evolution to be true, you need a creator. You need a living being to produce another living thing. Life doesn't come from inanimate objects. If you think it does, then wait for a grain of sand to turn into a single-celled organism. It will be an exercise in futility.
In conclusion, it is clear that a first cause is necessary for our existence in this universe. No thinking person can refute this fact. Join me in the philosphy of Aatheism and prove to an atheist that he isn't really an atheist at all. He is a deist praying and wishing that God doesn't exist. Help bring them out of their state of denial.
Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people
- Currently 5/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Tags:
Categories: